Checked fact 326531 Oct 2026Research

Anthropic's post says that giving the monitor access to the attacking AI's thought process made detection much easier.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

We also tried giving the monitor AI access to the attacking AI's thought process (also sometimes called its scratchpad or its chain-of-thought). ... this made the monitor model much better at spotting the side task, and reduced overall success rates by a substantial amount.

What the source said when we opened it, on 31 Oct 2026.

The source

SHADE-Arena: Evaluating sabotage in LLM agents
Anthropic · 2025-06-16

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 31 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

How AI monitors work, and how Anthropic's tests tried to evade them 31 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“Anthropic's post says that giving the monitor access to the attacking AI's thought process made detection much easier.” ai notis, checked 31 Oct 2026. Source: SHADE-Arena: Evaluating sabotage in LLM agents (Anthropic). https://ainotis.com/c/3265

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 31). Anthropic's post says that giving the monitor access to the attacking AI's thought process made detection much easier [Checked claim 3265]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/3265

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.