ainotis Join
My notis

Checked fact 442210 Nov 2026Laws and rulings

The order says that because payments are due monthly, reasonable consumers would plausibly understand "5x more usage than Pro" and "20x more usage than Pro" to mean 5x or 20x more usage per month.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

Because payments are due monthly, reasonable consumers would plausibly understand the phrases "5x more usage than Pro" and "20x more usage than Pro" to mean that if they pay a premium for Max 5x or Max 20x, they will get 5x or 20x more usage than Pro per month.

What the source said when we opened it, on 10 Nov 2026.

The source

Kahn v. Anthropic PBC, No. 26-cv-05763-AGT, Dkt. 50, Order on Motion to Dismiss (N.D. Cal., 6 Nov 2026)
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (copy hosted by Courthouse News) · 2026-11-06

Open the sourcearchived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on , against the source above.

In the story

Judge lets Anthropic's Claude Max usage advertising case proceed, calling it plausibly misleading 10 Nov 2026

Cite this fact

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.