Checked fact 442410 Nov 2026Laws and rulings

The order denies the motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff Smith's CLRA claim, the negligent misrepresentation claim and the breach of contract claim.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

The motion is denied as to the following claims: Plaintiff Smith's CLRA claim; the negligent misrepresentation claim; and the breach of contract claim.

What the source said when we opened it, on 10 Nov 2026.

The source

Kahn v. Anthropic PBC, No. 26-cv-05763-AGT, Dkt. 50, Order on Motion to Dismiss (N.D. Cal., 6 Nov 2026)
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (copy hosted by Courthouse News) · 2026-11-06

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 10 Nov 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Judge lets Anthropic's Claude Max usage advertising case proceed, calling it plausibly misleading 10 Nov 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“The order denies the motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff Smith's CLRA claim, the negligent misrepresentation claim and the breach of contract claim.” ai notis, checked 10 Nov 2026. Source: Kahn v. Anthropic PBC, No. 26-cv-05763-AGT, Dkt. 50, Order on Motion to Dismiss (N.D. Cal., 6 Nov 2026) (U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (copy hosted by Courthouse News)). https://ainotis.com/c/4424

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, November 10). The order denies the motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff Smith's CLRA claim, the negligent misrepresentation claim and the breach of contract claim [Checked claim 4424]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/4424

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.