ainotis Join
My notis

Checked fact 442710 Nov 2026Laws and rulings

The order says the two plaintiffs, Kahn and Smith, allege Anthropic PBC misleadingly markets its Claude Max subscriptions as providing "5x or 20x more usage" than Pro plans, on behalf of a putative class of Claude Max subscribers.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

allege that Anthropic PBC misleadingly markets its Claude Max subscriptions as providing "5x or 20x more usage" than Pro plans. ... On behalf of a putative class of Claude Max subscribers

What the source said when we opened it, on 10 Nov 2026.

The source

Kahn v. Anthropic PBC, No. 26-cv-05763-AGT, Dkt. 50, Order on Motion to Dismiss (N.D. Cal., 6 Nov 2026)
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (copy hosted by Courthouse News) · 2026-11-06

Open the sourcearchived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on , against the source above.

In the story

Judge lets Anthropic's Claude Max usage advertising case proceed, calling it plausibly misleading 10 Nov 2026

Cite this fact

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.