Checked fact 464612 Nov 2026Models and releases

The guide says: "Treat input as untrusted. User-supplied text can argue for its own classification. Write explicit criteria, test with adversarial examples, and keep a human or a second check on high-stakes actions such as payouts."

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

Treat input as untrusted. User-supplied text can argue for its own classification. Write explicit criteria, test with adversarial examples, and keep a human or a second check on high-stakes actions such as payouts.

What the source said when we opened it, on 12 Nov 2026.

The source

Decisions API guide, Gemini API docs
Google

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 12 Nov 2026, against the source above.

In the story

How a confidence score lets code act on Gemini Decisions API answers 12 Nov 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“The guide says: "Treat input as untrusted. User-supplied text can argue for its own classification. Write explicit criteria, test with adversarial examples, and keep a human or a second check on high-stakes actions such as payouts.".” ai notis, checked 12 Nov 2026. Source: Decisions API guide, Gemini API docs (Google). https://ainotis.com/c/4646

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, November 12). The guide says: "Treat input as untrusted. User-supplied text can argue for its own classification. Write explicit criteria, test with adversarial examples, and keep a human or a second check on high-stakes actions such as payouts." [Checked claim 4646]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/4646

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.