Checked fact 469213 Nov 2026Safety and security

Neither Fireworks' bulletins nor Notion's advisory, as opened on November 13, say that an AI model was used in the attack or name one.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

The evidence indicates links to a cybercriminal threat actor group, which is financially motivated and aimed at selling tokens from unauthorized access to Large Language Models (LLMs)

What the source said when we opened it, on 13 Nov 2026.

The source

Update on October 2026 security incident (Fireworks bulletin, last updated 9 November 2026)
Fireworks AI · 2026-11-09

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 13 Nov 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Notion says Fireworks AI breach affected under 1% of its workspaces 13 Nov 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“Neither Fireworks' bulletins nor Notion's advisory, as opened on November 13, say that an AI model was used in the attack or name one.” ai notis, checked 13 Nov 2026. Source: Update on October 2026 security incident (Fireworks bulletin, last updated 9 November 2026) (Fireworks AI). https://ainotis.com/c/4692

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, November 13). Neither Fireworks' bulletins nor Notion's advisory, as opened on November 13, say that an AI model was used in the attack or name one [Checked claim 4692]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/4692

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.