Checked fact 144614 Oct 2026Laws and rulings

The petition asks the court to rehear the case after a divided panel decided it on 25 September 2026; its conclusion says only that the court should grant the petition.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

A divided panel upheld that extraordinary designation. ... CONCLUSION The Court should grant the petition.

What the source said when we opened it, on 14 Oct 2026.

The source

Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel) · 2026-10-13

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 14 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Anthropic asks full D.C. Circuit to rehear Pentagon supply-chain ruling 14 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“The petition asks the court to rehear the case after a divided panel decided it on 25 September 2026; its conclusion says only that the court should grant the petition.” ai notis, checked 14 Oct 2026. Source: Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel)). https://ainotis.com/c/1446

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 14). The petition asks the court to rehear the case after a divided panel decided it on 25 September 2026; its conclusion says only that the court should grant the petition [Checked claim 1446]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/1446

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.