ainotis Join
My notis

Checked fact 145014 Oct 2026Laws and rulings

The petition argues that the majority read the statute's words "otherwise manipulate" to mean "arrange, operate, or control" regardless of subversive intent, so that the statute "turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it."

The exact words it rests on

Instead, it interpreted "otherwise manipulate" to mean "arrange, operate, or control"-- regardless of any subversive intent--so that the statute "turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it."

What the source said when we opened it, on 14 Oct 2026.

The source

Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel) · 2026-10-13

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on , against the source above.

In the story

Anthropic asks full D.C. Circuit to rehear Pentagon supply-chain ruling 14 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.