Checked fact 145014 Oct 2026Laws and rulings
The petition argues that the majority read the statute's words "otherwise manipulate" to mean "arrange, operate, or control" regardless of subversive intent, so that the statute "turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it."
The exact words it rests on
Instead, it interpreted "otherwise manipulate" to mean "arrange, operate, or control"-- regardless of any subversive intent--so that the statute "turns on what Anthropic does, not why Anthropic does it."
What the source said when we opened it, on 14 Oct 2026.
The source
Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum
Checked
Checked by the notis newsroom on , against the source above.
In the story
Anthropic asks full D.C. Circuit to rehear Pentagon supply-chain ruling 14 Oct 2026
Cite this fact
Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.