Checked fact 145214 Oct 2026Laws and rulings

On process, the petition says the Secretary bypassed the statute's pre-designation notice and opportunity to respond, that the majority held the violations harmless, and that this conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Cook.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

The Secretary bypassed those protections, invoking "an urgent national security interest" in a single conclusory sentence. App.225. The majority deemed the procedural violations harmless ... That defies precedent, including Trump v. Cook, 146 S.Ct. 2234, 2255 (2026)

What the source said when we opened it, on 14 Oct 2026.

The source

Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel) · 2026-10-13

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 14 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Anthropic asks full D.C. Circuit to rehear Pentagon supply-chain ruling 14 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“On process, the petition says the Secretary bypassed the statute's pre-designation notice and opportunity to respond, that the majority held the violations harmless, and that this conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Cook.” ai notis, checked 14 Oct 2026. Source: Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel)). https://ainotis.com/c/1452

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 14). On process, the petition says the Secretary bypassed the statute's pre-designation notice and opportunity to respond, that the majority held the violations harmless, and that this conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. Cook [Checked claim 1452]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/1452

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.