Checked fact 145314 Oct 2026Laws and rulings

On due process, the petition says the D.C. Circuit's precedents require notice and an opportunity to respond before a national-security designation absent a showing of particularized need, and that the majority deferred to the Secretary's assertions of urgency.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

This Court's due process precedents require notice and an opportunity to respond before a national-security designation is imposed--even for putative foreign terrorist organizations--absent a "showing of particularized need." ... The majority eviscerated that particularized-need standard by deferring to the Secretary's bare assertions of urgency despite obvious inconsistencies.

What the source said when we opened it, on 14 Oct 2026.

The source

Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel) · 2026-10-13

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 14 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Anthropic asks full D.C. Circuit to rehear Pentagon supply-chain ruling 14 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“On due process, the petition says the D.C. Circuit's precedents require notice and an opportunity to respond before a national-security designation absent a showing of particularized need, and that the majority deferred to the Secretary's assertions of urgency.” ai notis, checked 14 Oct 2026. Source: Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Anthropic PBC v. U.S. Department of War, Nos. 26-1049 and 26-1162 (D.C. Cir., filed 13 October 2026), with the 25 September 2026 panel opinion in its addendum (United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (filing by Anthropic's counsel)). https://ainotis.com/c/1453

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 14). On due process, the petition says the D.C. Circuit's precedents require notice and an opportunity to respond before a national-security designation absent a showing of particularized need, and that the majority deferred to the Secretary's assertions of urgency [Checked claim 1453]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/1453

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.