ainotis Join
My notis

Checked fact 216122 Oct 2026Safety and security

The court's order of 15 January 2026 describes the case as a dispute over large charitable donations Musk made to OpenAI in its infancy and Microsoft's later investments; Musk's claims against the OpenAI defendants include breach of charitable trust, constructive fraud, promissory fraud and unjust enrichment; it denied OpenAI's motion for summary judgment.

The exact words it rests on

This action arises from a contentious dispute between Elon Musk and Samuel Altman (and their respective companies) over large, charitable donations that Musk made to OpenAI, Inc. during the company's infancy and Microsoft's later investments in OpenAI, Inc.'s for-profit ventures. ... DENIES OpenAI defendants' motion ... move for summary judgment on Musk's claims for breach of charitable trust, constructive fraud, promissory fraud, and unjust enrichment

What the source said when we opened it, on 21 Oct 2026.

The source

Musk v. Altman, Order denying OpenAI defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 390)
US District Court, N.D. Cal. · 2026-01-15

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on , against the source above.

In the story

Who is Sam Altman? 22 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.