Checked fact 220422 Oct 2026Safety and security

OpenAI said it thinks its agreement has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic's, and that Anthropic should not be designated a supply chain risk.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

We think our agreement has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic’s. [...] Do you think Anthropic should be designated as a “supply chain risk”? No, and we have made our position on this clear to the government.

What the source said when we opened it, on 21 Oct 2026.

The source

Our agreement with the Department of War
OpenAI · 2026-02-28

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 21 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Who is Sam Altman? 22 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“OpenAI said it thinks its agreement has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic's, and that Anthropic should not be designated a supply chain risk.” ai notis, checked 21 Oct 2026. Source: Our agreement with the Department of War (OpenAI). https://ainotis.com/c/2204

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 21). OpenAI said it thinks its agreement has more guardrails than any previous agreement for classified AI deployments, including Anthropic's, and that Anthropic should not be designated a supply chain risk [Checked claim 2204]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/2204

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.