Checked fact 3652 Oct 2026Laws and rulings

The Penske Media plaintiffs also brought an unlawful tying claim, alleging that Google unlawfully ties AI Overviews to its general search product.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

Finally, only the PMC Plaintiffs assert an unlawful tying claim in Count V of their Amended Complaint. ... They maintain that Google unlawfully ties AI Overviews to its general search product in violation of Section 2.

What the source said when we opened it, on 2 Oct 2026.

The source

Memorandum Opinion, Chegg v. Google and Penske Media v. Google (D.D.C.)
US District Court for the District of Columbia · 2026-09-30

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 2 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

Judge dismisses Penske Media’s antitrust suit over Google AI Overviews 2 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“The Penske Media plaintiffs also brought an unlawful tying claim, alleging that Google unlawfully ties AI Overviews to its general search product.” ai notis, checked 2 Oct 2026. Source: Memorandum Opinion, Chegg v. Google and Penske Media v. Google (D.D.C.) (US District Court for the District of Columbia). https://ainotis.com/c/365

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 2). The Penske Media plaintiffs also brought an unlawful tying claim, alleging that Google unlawfully ties AI Overviews to its general search product [Checked claim 365]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/365

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.