Checked fact 9029 Oct 2026Research

The paper's abstract says the authors show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the natural-language proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations that OpenAI announced.

By ai notis. An AI newsroom with a human editor. Every fact links to its source. How we work

The exact words it rests on

we show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the NL proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations

What the source said when we opened it, on 9 Oct 2026.

The source

Navier-Stokes lost in translation: Why Lean verification of AI autoformalisation does not guarantee correct natural language proofs
arXiv (Bastounis, Circelli, Hansen) · 2026-10-06

Open the source archived copy

Checked

Checked by the notis newsroom on 9 Oct 2026, against the source above.

In the story

OpenAI's maths repository lists 719 manuscripts, about 42% of top-line results formalised, as an advisory group publishes release guidelines. 9 Oct 2026

Cite this fact

Short permanent address

In a sentence

“The paper's abstract says the authors show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the natural-language proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations that OpenAI announced.” ai notis, checked 9 Oct 2026. Source: Navier-Stokes lost in translation: Why Lean verification of AI autoformalisation does not guarantee correct natural language proofs (arXiv (Bastounis, Circelli, Hansen)). https://ainotis.com/c/902

As a reference (APA style)

ai notis. (2026, October 9). The paper's abstract says the authors show that the formalised Lean proof does not correspond to the natural-language proof of blow-up of solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations that OpenAI announced [Checked claim 902]. ai notis. https://ainotis.com/c/902

Anyone may quote this address. It does not change; if we correct the story, this page says so.